Observations, thoughts, reminiscences, and occasional rants on
anthropology, linguistics, old-time banjo, and anything else that crosses my path...
Dawkins might be good at something but he is a horrible geographer. The notion that the world can be accurately plotted out as a conglomerate of bounded, internally homogeneous populations is so 300 years ago. But what to expect from a man who apparently equates the words believer and dullard?
Comments and feedback are welcome, as long as they conform to normal standards of civility and decency. I will delete comments that do not meet these standards.