Friday, March 12, 2010

Educational malpractice at Liberty University


The internet news site Common Dreams carried an article recently about a group of students from Liberty University visiting the Smithsonian Institution. Students at LU are encouraged to fit natural history, and especially biological evolution, into the fantasy religion-based creationist biblical literalism advocated by the school's founder, the late fundamentalist evangelist Jerry Falwell. And, as an Indonesian fundamentalist Islamic saying goes, "when faith and facts conflict, faith wins."

Illustrating how faith wins over facts, LU students scoffed at the Smithsonian's model of a 210 million year old rat-sized creature hypothesized to be the common ancestor of all mammals. First, there's no way a ratty-looking thing could ever become a human being. Second, the 210 million year window for this to happen violates the young earth creationism taught at LU, which is based on arithmetical gymnastics of Archbishop James Ussher (1581-1656) who calculated that God created Everything on October 23, 4004 BC, making the Earth only around 6,000 years old.

Further reinforcing the triumph of faith over facts, Marcus Ross, an Assistant Professor of Geology at LU, made this comment about Adam and Eve:
"I feel they were real people, they were the first people."
OK, then. But there's a problem. "I feel..." is not a legitimate way to introduce a scientific proposition. "The evidence suggests..." would be more appropriate. But for these folks, evidence is not required. In fact, evidence that conflicts with "faith," which really means unquestioning obedience, is ignored, disparaged, ridiculed, tossed aside. It doesn't matter that the evidence suggests that there really never was, at any single point in time, a "first woman" or "first man." When evidence conflicts with faith, faith wins.

Anyway, I was intrigued by this article, so I went online to look for course descriptions at Liberty University. After all, LU is accredited by the same agency as my school, the University of North Florida.  I found a course called History of Life, and here are the description and "rationale" for that course:
COURSE DESCRIPTION
An interdisciplinary study of the origin and history of life in the universe. Faculty of the Center for Creation Studies will draw from science, religion, history, and philosophy in presenting the evidence and arguments for creation and against evolution. This course is required for all Liberty students. 

RATIONALE
This course is designed to instill in our students a clear understanding of the relationship between science and Scripture as it pertains to the study of origins. In particular, it is designed to help students develop a clear and consistent Biblical creationist worldview and defend it.
Wow. The "History of Life" is essentially a course designed to show students how to ignore almost everything we know about the history of life in favor of a rambling collection of myths written down by some Middle Eastern nomads centuries before anyone even knew that life on Earth is carbon-based. And just to drive the point home, here are the course's "measurable learning outcomes" (at least they have the academic assessment jargon down pat):

A. Students should be able to discuss and contrast creation science and evolution worldviews.
B. Students should be able to discuss the creation science view from Biblical accounts and rebut creation compromise views. 
C. Students should be able to discuss the theories of natural selection and evolution. 
D. Students should be able to discuss scientific evidences in support of a recent creation. 
E. Students should be able to discuss the evidence of the fossil record and its implications of origins. 
F. Students should be able to discuss evidence for the unique creation of man. 
G. Students should be able to discuss evidence for creation using concepts such as irreducible complexity. 
H. Students should be able to discuss the importance of the Biblical creation message in understanding major doctrines and application for personal evangelism.
Why is this "educational malpractice," as I suggested in the title of this post? It's malpractice because this university's faculty are lying to their students, just as egregiously as if, in an astronomy class, they taught them that the Sun revolves around the Earth. And, by the way, this would be true even if the lies were not based on religious dogma.

The empirical, objectively valid facts about the history of life on Earth, the falsifiable hypotheses that scientists create to describe and explain those facts, and the theories that result when related  unfalsified hypotheses converge on the explanation of some set of those facts, cannot be evaluated by what's in the Bible, any more than they can be evaluated by what's in Lord of the Rings.

I believe that the accrediting agency should put Liberty University's program in biology on probation until those who teach in that program stop lying to their students.

31 comments:

  1. About all I can say is, what appalled me the most was what students were supposed to learn from this "History of Life" course. Which is, apparently creationist apologetics. IOW, whatever else they are learning, it isn't science.
    Anne G

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is terribly depressing. I agree with your assessment and your proposed solution.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very well put, Ron. I seriously think you should send a copy of this blog, or a letter with similar content, to the accrediting agency.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It is pointless to argue or reason with people whose doctrine is based on an eggregious mistranslation of the first sentence in Genesis. Their ideological bankruptcy is manifest in their recitation of slogans. Their beliefs are deemed true, and no conceivable observation or discovery is relevant, unless it is apparently supportive of the doctrine, perhaps a Neanderthal cave painting of the holy trinity--Try this one on them and see what happens "In the beginnnings, the gods created the sky and the land." Poof, their ideology evaporates.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I am not sure they are "lying" to the students, except in saying they are qualified to teach at a college level. Is it lying to pass along a lie if one was lied to? Is it lying if these colleges truly "feel" like the facts are irrelevant in the face of biblical "truths?" After all, what does it profit to learn science if it means being farther from "The Word?"

    They aren't lying, they are blinded by religion and passing out blindfolds to protect these students from getting too much knowledge of the world.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Is that a course for biology credit?

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Is that a course for biology credit?"

    I don't know, but maybe not. It has a "CRST" prefix, and it's required of all students. However, their BIOL 101 "Principles of Biology" states that students will:

    "Acquire a conviction that life is significant because it is created by God. He designed living things for the joy it brought Him and for His first great gift to His greatest creature, Man."

    Not science.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is as disturbing as everyone has already said. I can't imagine, as a student, looking at this course description and thinking this is acceptable. What's tragically ironic, though, is that this institution is doing a disservice not only to their students and to science but also to their own religion. They are creating large quantities of "believers" who are taught to distrust science, fact, and common sense, thereby making themselves targets of ridicule rather than respect. They're "teaching" students to defend themselves against evolutionists but not actually equipping their students with an intellectual edge (because they can't).

    I wonder: Does the school provide research databases with scholarly, peer-reviewed, scientific journals? What are the instructors' expectations when it comes to scientific research? I'm not sure I want to know.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I actually think the learning outcomes are quite good; in fact I think all biology students should be able to "Discuss" the issue -- and hopefully come to the same conclusions that Darwin and countless others since have. Nothing wrong with discussing. The problem comes with whether the outcomes of the discussion are a requirement for a pass in this course. What would LU faculty do if a student could demonstrate competence in discussing "evidence for the unique creation of man" and then coming to the conclusion that it wasn't true?

    Mark

    ReplyDelete
  10. Note objective B, especially the word "rebut":

    Students should be able to discuss the creation science view from Biblical accounts and rebut creation compromise views.

    ReplyDelete
  11. So nice, thank full to post valuable information, you done your best.
    ………………
    Dissertation Writing Help

    ReplyDelete
  12. What is most disturbing is that the majority of people take the THEORY of evolution as FACT and completely are afraid of any sort of discourse that it is THEORY. Why? As for facts that PROVE that evolution is absolutely, positively true...bring them on now. They are all intellectual gymnastics and posturing. And now, we have Carl Sagan saying that we came from aliens! Come on...let's do some real and actual dialogue and look for truth and stop the name calling of those who point out obvious flaws in the belief system of evolution.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous: The fact that you can write your first sentence above shows that you do not understand what a fact is, what a theory is, or what science is. You might want to go back in the archives and read my posting on from July 2009 titled "Creationism in not a theory." Here's the link:

    http://crankylinguist.blogspot.com/2009/07/creationism-is-not-theory.html

    You're out of your depth here. Go back to school.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Considerably, the article is in reality the greatest on this noteworthy topic.College papers. I agree with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your next updates. Saying thanks will not just be sufficient, for the wonderful clarity in your writing.Webpage screenshot. I will immediately grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Pleasant work and much success in your business dealings!

    ReplyDelete
  15. hmm...your post is good. i really like it. . .nice job keep sharing ;)
    Dissertations Writing

    ReplyDelete
  16. That is very good comment you shared.Thank you so chat much that for you shared those things with us.Im wishing you chat sohbet to carry on with ur achivments.All the best .

    ReplyDelete
  17. Love the attitude, not much to say, which is really rare for me, but I am trying to behave, which is really rare too. Great post I loved it.

    cpanel reseller hosting | whm reseller hosting

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yemek Tarifleri Thanks for this post – I have struggled with this as I have NO comments yet on my blog and in some ways feel badly about that (until i read your posts about this) and yet I see there is more that I can do. thankss.

    ReplyDelete
  19. This is my Good luck that I found your post which is according to my search and topic, I think you are a great blogger, thanks for helping me outta my problem..
    Dissertation Abstract Help

    ReplyDelete
  20. i really like your post .. i will like to bookmark your site for my future needs :)
    custom dissertation writing | dissertation writing UK

    ReplyDelete
  21. The students at LU know they are going to a Christian University. And they will not be shocked at what they are taking. For me a student of Religion, this sort of teaching will only help me. If you dont like what they teach dont go the school. Just like i wouldnt want to go to a public university to major in religion

    ReplyDelete
  22. A very nice page. I think the effort has passed, we have to thank you:))
    Dis estetiği

    ReplyDelete
  23. Your article is marvelous. I feel like reading it again and again. I admire your work. You have done a good work. Thanks for sharing.
    dissertations writing

    ReplyDelete
  24. Liberty isn't such a bad school... You pay your money, get your degree which is probably more marketable than most colleges if the people hiring you are Christian (reverse discrimination?)

    plus not only do we spend less time having to learn (since there are no classes to attend) but also because roughly 1/3 of the learning isn't factual but training in how to respond to "the devil's mouthpieces like yours".

    I'm not saying that your the Devil but Jerry probably would have thought your going to spend eternity in his company. If there is a hell, IMHO, Jerry's pretty darn hot!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Sorry, Did you take this course? I didn't think so, therefore I don't think you have any real idea what the class is teaching.

    You believe in tolerance but when anyone disagrees or allows freedom of thought beyond YOUR view you feel offended and want to shut them up. Your hypocrisy is appalling.

    ReplyDelete
  26. I like the valuable information you provide in your articles. I’ll bookmark your blog and check again here frequently. I’m quite certain I’ll learn many new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!

    ReplyDelete
  27. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Comments and feedback are welcome, as long as they conform to normal standards of civility and decency. I will delete comments that do not meet these standards.

The wrong frame

We keep hearing in the News about the economic disaster Coronavirus has wrought upon us: so many jobs lost, so many unemployed, people unabl...